[Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ] [Escola de Química - UFRJ]
NEITEC é aprovado no cadastro da Plataforma Nacional de Infraestrutura de Pesquisa – MCTI (PNIPE)
Circular Economy in Green Businesses in Colombia
NEITEC convida especialista em Propriedade Intelectual e Inovação para palestra
NEITEC irá participar do iLabthon
Agricultura Regenerativa: uma perspectiva de modelo de negócio circular
Lançamento em breve do livro "Catalisando a Economia Circular"!
A Economia Circular no Cenário do COVID-19
Chemical Leasing,
um olhar na Química Verde e na Sustentabilidade
Chemical Leasing,
um olhar na Química Verde e na Sustentabilidade
Núcleo de Estudos Industriais e Tecnológicos - UFRJ

centro de excelência na área de Gestão da Inovação, Inteligência Competitiva,
Prospecção Tecnológica e Monitoramento Tecnológico e Mercadológico

O Setor de Borracha na Economia Circular
Políticas públicas voltadas para Economia Circular:
Um olhar sobre as experiências na Europa e na China
Iniciativas de Economia Circular na Indústria do Aço
Potencial do Biogás no Gerenciamento de Resíduos
e Sua Inserção na Economia Circular
Cadeias Produtivas e Governança
no Contexto da Economia Circular
Uma Visão dos Modelos de Negócios Circulares
Princípios, perspectivas e aplicação
do Chemical Leasing nos processos
de produção visando a sustentabilidade
A Economia Circular Além dos Horizontes
Logística Reversa na Economia Circular
A Simbiose Industrial além das fronteiras
previous arrow
next arrow

Circular Molecules

A economia circular e a digitalização serão as duas tendências mais importantes empregadas pela indústria química alemã, na medida em que ela se aproximar de 2030. Essas tendências, de acordo com a Associação Alemã da Indústria Química, irão “alterar fundamentalmente o modo” de funcionamento da indústria.

Reproduzido de Circular Molecules, por Rémy Le Moigne.

The circular economy and digitalisation will be the two most important trends employed by Germany’s chemical industry as it moves towards 2030. These trends, according to the German Chemical Industry Association, will “fundamentally alter the way” the industry is working.

Chemicals used in products such as plastics and fertilisers, are scrutinised for their negative impact on the environment and human health. Surprisingly, chemicals used for acids and lubricants receive much less attention, yet when managed improperly, the detrimental effects of these processes are no better.

Most industrial sectors use chemicals at some stage in their processes, from automotive to life sciences, and consumer products to oil and gas. In most cases, chemical efficiency can be startlingly low, and the chemical yield — the percentage of a chemical quantity that is consumed or converted during a chemical reaction — is often less than 50%. This means that half of the chemical becomes waste without once being used. In some industrial processes, chemical yield can be as low as 5%. Additionally, for disposal purposes, spent chemicals have to be converted into water which can be discharged, and waste sludge that can be burnt or buried. This conversion consumes additional chemicals. For instance, alkali is used to neutralised acid effluents, and lime to extract spent chemicals.

We know that chemical waste is often not managed properly in environmental terms. Many industrial sites still release spent chemicals directly into the environment with scant regard for proper treatment, resulting in contaminated water, soil, and air. India’s agricultural farmland situated near “severely polluted” industrial sites see their revenues reduced by 9% due to industrial water pollution alone. A recent study has revealed that approximately half of Texas’ major industrial facilities were releasing illegal levels of pollution into rivers, lakes and other waterways.

Something that receives less attention is that this mismanagement of chemicals is affecting companies economically, as well. According to the OECD, many have little understanding of their chemical management costs. Yet, the ratio of those costs to chemical purchase costs is estimated to be between 5:1 to 10:1. Hence, for each euro of chemicals purchased, five to ten euros are additionally spent to manage them. Companies could adopt new chemical usage strategies by circulating the molecules tied up in chemicals that have reached the end of their life span, and reuse chemicals more than once. This would result in capturing the value of those chemicals, while reducing their environmental impact.

Recirculating spent chemicals

According to a recent study, up to 60% of the European chemical industry molecules supplied to industry and end-users could be recirculated. Yet, today, very few chemicals used in industrial processes are recycled. In the US, only 0.7% of solvents are recovered. Still, many chemicals, including solvents, acids, and lubricants, can be recovered using processes such as distillation, filtration, or chemical regeneration. For more than 50 years, Speichim Processing, a subsidiary of Séché Group, has regenerated spent solvents using various distillation technologies (vacuum distillation, distillation under reduced pressure, etc.) in three locations in France. This custom processing enables the Group to obtain the characteristics of a new solvent in a cost-effective way.

Industrial sites consuming large quantities of chemicals could invest in dedicated recycling units. Carbon steel producers, for example, consume large volumes of hydrochloric acid for steel pickling, and use acid regeneration units to convert spent acid, coming from the pickling line, into a fresh acid.

Industrial sites that cannot afford to invest in on-site regeneration units still have the option to have their chemicals recycled off-site. The Montrose branch of the pharmaceutical group GSK, uses the solvent, methyl alcohol, for its industrial process. Once used, the alcohol is collected by the supplier, recycled, and returned to GSK. The recycled solvent quality is identical to that of the original. Managing methyl alcohol in a closed loop, GSK reduced its waste by 1,200 tons and its costs by more than 250,000 euros annually.

Industrial sites can also buy and sell recycled chemicals. With the assistance of Veolia, titanium dioxide producer Cristal Group converts acid effluent and the CO2 it emits into three valuable resources (acid, gypsum and sodium, or potassium bicarbonate) that will be sold or reused. In the Netherlands, InterCheM recycles solvents for its customers, and also sells recycled solvents.

Frequently, recycled chemicals are not only cheaper than newly produced ones, but they also reduce resource consumption, waste generation, and greenhouse gas emissions. The carbon emissions through solvent recycling are 46 to 92% lower than those of new solvent production.

Use chemicals in cascade

Chemicals can not only be recycled, they also can be reused. Through “industrial symbiosis”, spent chemicals from one industrial process can become the feedstock for another. For instance, ferric chloride, the by-product of steel pickling in hydrochloric acid, can be used for water treatment processes.

CO2, mainly a by-product of combustion processes, is rarely reused and ends up in the atmosphere as a harmful greenhouse gas. It could soon replace petrochemical feedstocks to produce chemicals and polymers. Siemens and Evonik are currently conducting a research programme to produce basic and specialty chemicals such as ethylene from CO2. It has been estimated that approximately 5 to 10% of total carbon dioxide emissions could be used to produce chemicals and fuels. Using CO2 as feedstock to produce chemicals will not be enough to mitigate climate change alone but it would definitely be a step in the right direction.

Chemical industrial parks, where companies which produce and use chemicals, are located on common property in convenient locations to implement synergies. In China, the Midong Chemical Industrial Park has enabled the symbiosis of 32 industries, allowing exchange of more than 4.74 million tons of undesirable materials between 18 industrial companies per annum.

Pay per function

Perhaps the best way to manage chemicals would be to pay per function provided, rather than per quantity consumed. Solvic, a subsidiary of Solvay in Antwerp, produces basic chemicals for the production of Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC). This production process involves the use of highly concentrated sulphuric acid for drying chlorine. Instead of being sent to a waste water treatment facility, spent acid is returned to the supplier, regenerated to the quality needed for the drying process, and shipped back to Solvic, who pay per ton of dried chlorine and not per ton of sulphuric acid.

The service-oriented business model that shifts the focus from increasing the sales volume of chemicals, towards a value-added approach is called Chemical Leasing. In a Chemical Leasing model, the producer mainly sells the functions performed by the chemical, and functional units are the main basis for payment. Functional units can be, for example, the number of pieces cleaned, or the amount of area coated.

The United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) has promoted chemical leasing for more than ten years. The organisation has a successful track record of dozens of projects, mainly in emerging countries. Today, the model is starting to be adopted more widely. A study on behalf of the German Federal Environment Agency estimates that more than 400 chemical leasing contracts exist in Germany, mainly for the cleaning of pipes and vessels in the food industry, and for the use of abrasives in the metal industry.

Challenges ahead

If molecule recirculation brings many benefits, it is not without challenges, starting with energy consumption. A key difference between chemical products and products made of glass and steel is that the production of chemical products requires modifications of molecular bonds. This modification inherently changes the nature of the product itself and is therefore more energy intensive. Distillation, for example, is the most commonly used technology to regenerate solvents, and is very energy intensive. However, life cycle analysis still demonstrates that the environmental benefits of solvent recycling are worth pursuing.

Getting started

Every chemical user should assess the economic and environmental benefit of molecule recirculation, at least for high potential chemicals, usually based on cost, volume and hazardousness. Chemical users should evaluate available separation and recycling technologies such as membrane filtration, and ion exchange or distillation, with their suppliers. They should look for nearby industrial sites willing to use waste as a resource or to provide their waste as a feedstock.

Until recently, identifying such synergies was challenging, since most companies were unwilling to share data on the raw materials they used or the waste they produced. But new technologies are solving this issue. Leveraging open and big data, the web platform iNex Circular is able to identify potential synergies for a given chemical within a given territory. To reduce chemical disposal costs, companies should analyse how their waste water treatment plant can be redesigned to make energy, clean water and chemicals, rather than process waste. Because, according to Scientific American, “the future of sewage is power and profits”.

Today, chemical producers and users need to fundamentally alter the way they work. They should produce and use chemicals that are “benign by design”. They need to design and manage chemicals and processes in order to allow molecules to be recirculated.

It’s worth keeping in mind the words of R W Hofmann, a former President of the London’s Royal College of Chemistry: “In an ideal chemical factory there is, strictly speaking, no waste but only products. The better a real factory makes use of its waste, the closer it gets to its ideal, the bigger is the profit.”

Hofmann said this in 1848, but the statement is as relevant as ever. What are we waiting for?